Website wiretapping (California)
California law lets visitors claim damages when websites secretly record sessions or share data with third parties.
Where this case stands
Now
Attorneys are investigating and gathering claimants. No suits may be on file yet, but early registration positions a case for review.
Next
Check the criteria below. Qualifying claims are typically pursued as individual arbitrations, handled by a firm on your behalf.
What this case is about
Under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), websites that use chat widgets, session-replay, or 'trap and trace' tracking to capture and share visitor data without consent may owe statutory damages of up to $5,000 per violation.
Cases describe allegations that the defendants deny. Facts are drawn from public court records, settlement administrators, and litigation trackers, and can change as the case moves.
What a review will look at
- The website name and roughly when you visited
- Confirmation you were in California at the time
- Whether you used chat or entered personal information
Missing records aren’t a dealbreaker — legal teams help people gather them all the time.
Privacy & data
Related cases we’re tracking
Not what you’re looking for? Browse every active case or start a general claim check.